TY  - JOUR
T1  - Expert Consensus on the Clinical Application of Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Colorectal Cancer, Precancerous Lesions, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease 
AU  - Pan, Peng
AU  - Wang, Cheng-Long
AU  - Zhao, Sheng-Bing
AU  - Zuo, Xiuli
AU  - Jin, Zhen-Dong
AU  - Liao, Zhuan
AU  - Bai, Yu
JF  - Cancer Screening and Prevention
VL  - 
IS  - 000
SN  - 2835-3315
SP  - 
EP  - 
Y1  - 2026-12-30
DO  - 10.14218/CSP.2026.00022
UR  - https://www.xiahepublishing.com/2835-3315/CSP-2026-00022
AB  - Colorectal diseases pose a serious threat to human health, and conventional endoscopy has limitations in lesion characterization. This consensus aims to clarify the indications, operational specifications, image interpretation criteria, and quality control requirements for probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) in lower gastrointestinal diseases, particularly colorectal cancer, precancerous lesions and polyps, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A systematic literature search covered PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang Database through August 2026. Evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Forty-eight experts participated in two rounds of discussion and online voting, with agreement ≥80% required for consensus. Eight recommendations were finalized: five strong and three weak. Strong recommendations address colorectal lesion differentiation, targeted biopsy, mucosal barrier assessment, ulcerative colitis mucosal healing and relapse prediction, and IBD-associated colorectal neoplasia surveillance. Weak recommendations address distal resection margin assessment during radical surgery for low rectal cancer, irritable bowel syndrome research, and adjunctive IBD diagnosis and differentiation. Evidence for endoscopic resection margin assessment remains insufficient, and pCLE is not recommended for routine diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome. pCLE provides adjunctive microscopic information for colorectal lesion characterization, targeted biopsy, and IBD assessment and surveillance; in IBD diagnosis, it does not replace conventional endoscopic and histopathological evaluation. This consensus provides evidence-based guidance for standardized clinical application.